Shale and Gender Stereotypes in Dragon Age
Jul 27
Smashing gender roles and darkspawn skulls
Most of the main characters we travel Ferelden with fit into traditional gender roles. Even those who may not be someone we’d encounter in our everyday lives still do not do much to challenge stereotypes. Let’s take a brief look at them.
Wynne – matronlike, nourishing healer.
Alistair – manly man, fights with big sword, short hair, strong facial lines.
Oghren – dwarf, drinks a lot, swears, swings a big axe.
Leliana – fights from range, does her hair up, likes pretty things.
Morrigan – fights from range, wears makeup, likes pretty things.
Enough for now. The one character who I think really makes us think about our own ideas and definitions of gender is Shale.
When first meeting this character in Honnleath, there are no signals as to the gender of the golem. Shale is simply made of stone. However, this golem has one feature that makes gender especially an object of attention – the player-character is only referred to as “It” when Shale speaks. Something like: “Does it wish me to follow?” “Does it like being the master?” Being called “It” is jarring and immediately makes the player react by thinking of what gender they’re actually playing. Ignoring gender, denying it just brings it into high relief.
Shale doesn’t have any particular gendered features. Stone is rather neutral. One of the first things you see Shale do is kill a bird, the race of creatures it despises beyond measure, and the golem seems to be rather angry, deservedly, at the old master. Shale is very logical, not only in dialogue, but also in party banter. The conversations between Sten and Shale are somewhat philosophical and detached. We have then violence, anger, hatred, and logic. Not particularly masculine characteristics, but certainly not feminine ones when we’re thinking of stereotypes. Morrigan is logical but this is precisely the trait that makes her different than the others and one can make excuses for her. She was raised in isolation. She has a demon for a mother. She’s half-animal, etc. Female and logic don’t go together when thinking of traditional roles. It doesn’t necessarily go with male either, particularly when violence and anger are involved. Aggression surely fits into a stereotypical view of masculinity, but Shale is hardly defined by just that.

Dialogue with the warden continues the a-gendered characterization. At one point, Shale will ask if the crystals make them look wide. But at another time, Shale responds to the comment that there is a human inside the golem with, “If so, it is because I ate him”. At one point, a non-party character can say regarding Shale, “I think the odds might be slightly in his favor at a test of strength.” Shale is, of course, a tank as seems the suitable role for a golem. Big, burly, takes lots of damage – a masculine role stereotypically.
It is only later in the story that the player can discover Shale’s true gender, or what it was in the past. *spoiler alert* Clearly, Shale, before the episode in the Deep Roads, did not recall her own gender and is anatomically without a sex once a golem. Two questions arise from this observation.
First, does Shayle lose her gender when she loses her human identity and sexuality upon becoming a golem, and if so, why? I find it somewhat odd that an entire personality would change even under such conditions as golem formation. Shale retains memories of her past, so why would she not remember and still be somewhat herself.
Second, do golems not have gender because they are anatomically neuter or because they are made of stone or something else? I think most of us would be in mutual agreement that gender is not the same as biological sex. In a game that was lauded for its acceptance of non-traditional sexual relationships, I was at first surprised that Shale was not presented in a more feminine light even when a golem. Surely, she was still female regardless of anatomy, wasn’t she? However, I now think this says something deeper about Shayle’s personality.
When the dwarves began making the golem warriors, Shayle was the only woman to volunteer for the job and was among the first of all volunteers. Perhaps, Shayle is not represented in a feminine light because, although an anatomical woman, she doesn’t fill the stereotypical role that Wynne and Leliana do. Instead of either healing or fighting safe at range, Shale is in the midst of the action. And she’s not backstabbing. She’s stomping, and bellowing, and roaring as she gets pummeled nonstop. She’s tough and buxom. I wonder if perhaps her personality didn’t actually change very much when she became a golem. It would take a strong woman to make the choice that Shayle made.
Looking at her now, I have no complaints about how she is portrayed. I am glad she is a female who defies stereotypical roles, to such an extent, she is mistaken for being male. Yes, it took a golem made of stone without sexual anatomy to allow this, but it’s a step.
Liked the article? Support us so we can bring you even more high quality content.














22 comments
Comment by CLNPTRL on July 27, 2010 at 4:41 am
I face-palmed five or six times from this article.
The whole gender-role/personality-trait thing is kind of twisted, heavily flawed. This whole thing is kind of sexist in the extreme (I do realize a woman wrote it). I don't think the narrative of DA:O was very well understood by the writer, or the world lore retained. It almost looks like the game wasn't really played, just watched.
Shale retains some memories of her past, mostly things that had happened since she was found by Wilhelm. She remembered practically nothing from before then. Not surprising since she was frozen in the Deep Roads for an indeterminate, though very long amount of time. Then there's the process of becoming a golem. Molten lyrium poured into the body, screaming in agony as the golem body is formed around the old one. It makes it clear why control rods were necessary, it should be expected that process would drive the dwarf/golem insane.
I am compelled to point out that Flemeth is not a demon, she is an abomination (a possessed mage), though a highly unusual one in. Morrigan is not a half animal, she uses shape-shifting magic, huge difference.
Also, "Being called “It” is jarring and immediately makes the player react by thinking of what gender they’re actually playing." Really? Seriously? Whatever, that's just…. no… just no.
Comment by Brinstar on July 27, 2010 at 4:58 am
I think I agree with some of the post, but the way it was written was disjointed, confusing, and difficult to follow.
But I do know this. I don't agree with commenter CLNPTRL. I think the post actually has some insight, and that commenter CLNPTRL is sort of missing the point about thematic and social criticism of games.
Comment by Poe-it on July 27, 2010 at 5:25 am
Okay first of all, all you have to do is look at Shale and know she is female. The rounded hips the larger rear and her legs. But that is neither here nor there. You have managed to put everyone into little boxes.
I suppose if you make the game more than it is and really go looking for deeper meaning I suppose you can say what you wish. Its game it maybe my favorite game. The characters are not real. However, you failed to even try to put Zevran into your matrix why is that? Is it because he is long haired fights at close range and prefers women to men but is bi-sexual?
Comment by CLNPTRL on July 27, 2010 at 5:53 am
I understand the point of thematic and social criticism of games, but that's not what this is. The author is writing about complex issues with a tenuous grasp on them, actually asking questions rather than answering them.
"First, does Shayle lose her gender when she loses her human identity and sexuality upon becoming a golem, and if so, why?"
Shayle lost gender because she lost her memories, this has to do with gender identity, but also with personal identity, identity formation, self-concept, and more. It is possible that if Shale had all of the memories of her mortal life she might be more "feminine".
"Second, do golems not have gender because they are anatomically neuter or because they are made of stone or something else? I think most of us would be in mutual agreement that gender is not the same as biological sex."
That's an issue of gender identity, not gender. We also don't really have much frame of reference on golems, we only speak to two, Shale and Caradin.
"Surely, she was still female regardless of anatomy, wasn’t she? "
No, If we accept gender identity to be separate from physical gender, Shayle (who no longer has a physical gender) is only female as long as she considers herself such. If Shale can not remember being female, has no physical gender, and does not identify as female, then Shale is not in any way female.
'Shale the Golem' could be (and maybe should be) considered an entirely separate individual from 'Shayle of House Cadash'. Though not everyone would agree on that. Personal identity is a tricky thing.
Comment by Brinstar on July 27, 2010 at 8:00 am
This comment is far more understandable than what I thought you were attempting to say in your first comment. If you had covered this in your initial comment, rather than writing a comment just as confusing as the original post, then I would have understood you. And now that you've explained in a way that is actually clear–I agree with you.
Secondly, why should anyone hold the author to having answers to questions she asks? I don't think anyone can answer any of those identity questions except for Shale.
Comment by CLNPTRL on July 27, 2010 at 6:36 am
I kind of doubt even Shale could answer those questions with absolute certainty.
In honesty, I just take issue with writing like this. It is written in a needlessly confusing manner, takes no stance, asks questions without attempting an answer, and it's not exactly informative. I don't expect all writers to be experts, but this article just bugged me.
The whole "She has a demon for a mother. She’s half-animal, etc." thing just whipped up some nerd fury too. I was needlessly hostile in my first comment, to the writer I apologize for that part.
Comment by Fallerup on July 27, 2010 at 6:43 am
I must agree to disagree with this. I do not for one second wonder what gender I play, ever. The fact that that thing tries to drag me to it's level, by calling me "it" doesn't effect me. I find it funny. I do admit, I first thought Shale was male, I mean, listen to the voice… it's not actually feminine, unless it's a really old person (Sorry voice actor :).
one thing puzzles me however. When you ask shale about Wilhelm and why she doesn't call him it (like she does everyone else), she just says "I know" or something like that. One must wonder if she, even if she killed him and hates him and all that respected him enough to call him by his right gender, or perhaps because he was her master and she hasn't had one since. If she had had free will, she might call him "it" as well, one must wonder about this, yes?
Morrigan is a shapeshifting mage, she is 100% human. There have been discussions about, if she really is Flemeth's daughter or not. I don't think she is, despite the fact she has the same feral eyes as Flemeth does. Maybe its part of being a shapeshifter, who knows? Of course I could be wrong, we will never know unless they choose to reveal it in a DLC or something.
Comment by Kateri on July 27, 2010 at 11:46 am
I interpreted things slightly differently with regard to: "Clearly, Shale, before the episode in the Deep Roads, did not recall her own gender" .
I got the impression that Shale always knew she was female, but, as she says, when the PC expresses surprise at finding out, "I did not think it needed to be said." She also has a banter with Leliana in which she refers to them as not being "sisters", which I'm pretty sure can happen before she goes to Cadash Thaig.
I expect you're basing your view on the line: "I was a…woman??" when she finds out. I thought she was not expressing surprise at her feminity, but at the discovery she was an ex-creature of flesh.
I see Shale as being in a strange position, before she regains her memories. She has, as you say, no memories of being raised as female, or living as female. Her body is not female, and she is aware that nobody else will see her as such – thus her waving-off of the subject, saying that as a golem, she has no gender.
But I submit that Shale, with or without memories, the "correct" body, and any societal reinforcement, always understands, within herself, that she is female.
Am I going too far in seeing a validation of trans women's experience here?
Denis wrote a great post on Shale some time ago, at The Border House: http://borderhouseblog.com/?p=701
Comment by will the geek on July 27, 2010 at 12:44 pm
very interesting article but im not sure im agree with you
Comment by @Longasc on July 27, 2010 at 2:19 pm
A Golem has no visible sex, probably does not even have any sex at all. It does not matter to them, nor do they have a need for a bipolar concept of gender (male/female).
It seems not matter for Shale if the player is male or female. I think Shale is so far away from her life as Shayle that she does not even put value into identifying the gender or sex of any fleshy being.
Instead of this she seems to have other categories: Stone/Golem, Flesh, Fish… and the worst: BIRD.
P.S.: I wonder what confused the commenters. Questions were asked, nobody has to "follow" questions, there is just a need to think about them.
The only thing that I found truly disturbing was that this whiny boy Alistair got called a manly man. I would called that flawed perception or wishful thinking! :)
Comment by Dave on July 27, 2010 at 2:38 pm
I can think of about a thousand adjectives I'd use to describe Shale before resorting to "buxom". I mean, I guess it's technically correct, if a rock can be "vigorously or healthily plump" or "full-bosomed".
Comment by pad man on July 27, 2010 at 10:30 pm
im not too fond of shale
Comment by Godzilla Guru on July 28, 2010 at 3:02 am
I’ve never had the pleasure of playing any DLC, so I never got to add Shale to my party; however the more I read about this character, the more interesting she becomes. I try to avoid stereotypes if I can (though I don’t think I’ve done a very good job at that, personally), I do know that they exist for a reason…
Comment by Darren on August 1, 2010 at 12:05 am
I don’t really think that Shale would have lost her sense of self, of her femininity or character despite having been made into a golem. Indeed, we see her character very pointedly from the very outset. Not all women feel the need or compulsion to be ultra feminine, to like pretty things, or to even interact as is expected a woman should act.
We know Shale was both a warrior, and the only woman (i think) to step forward to fight the darkspawn as a golem in the initial bit, and that says a lot about her personality of being a strong, determined person and not someone who necessarily think well of those weaker than her, much as she is today. There are many women who are perfectly happy to do hard manual labour and jobs that are traditionally thought of as male jobs, and their personalities fit with that situation, rather than conforming to the male dominated stereotypes. I don’t think Shale conformed in the past to anything except being a warrior.
I think it is likely that, knowing her past as we do, that she changed very little after becoming a golem, and even once she was lost in the deep roads for so long, she appeared to have gone into a sort of sleep state, because there was little to look at, and this perhaps helped save her mind from madness brought on by boredom.
In truth though, in many respects I think that the way Shale was designed was a sort of in-joke with the Bioware team, (who are very lgbt diverse) who created a ‘stone butch’. And before anyone starts ranting that Shale isn’t a lesbian, not all stone butches are.
In general though, I think that
Comment by Adarel on August 2, 2010 at 7:51 pm
Hm, I don't think I left out Zevran intentionally. He deserves discussion on his own, certainly, and I wanted to focus more on Shale here. I also have never spent much time with Zevran in my own party so he may have just slipped my mind.
Also, I have said the first part to male friends of mine – "Look at her behind!". They didn't see it, for some reason.
Comment by Adarel on August 2, 2010 at 5:57 pm
As to the last paragraph, if you are a woman playing a male character (or vice versa) and tend to get somewhat attached to your characters as I do, I think it's a bit jarring.
Describing Morrigan as "half-animal" is hyperbole. There's a long dialogue the player can have with her about whether or not she turns into an actual animal when she shapeshifts. She doesn't, but the fact that Witches of the Wild are shapeshifters plays into their characterization as wild, socially-outcast folk. From the perspective of a city-dweller, she very likely seems half-animal.
I also realized this topic was going to be controversial. It's hard to discuss gender, stereotypes, etc. and not make people uncomfortable.
Comment by Adarel on August 2, 2010 at 5:58 pm
Thanks for the criticism and support, Brin.
Comment by Adarel on August 2, 2010 at 6:00 pm
Thank you for all the thoughtful comments, everyone! Do know I never expect you all to agree with me and am much more interested in prompting discussion and insight. :)
Comment by Xanify on August 3, 2010 at 12:21 pm
It's "Shale" not "Shayle"
Comment by stevegarbage on August 3, 2010 at 1:25 pm
Shayle of House Cadash was the name of the female dwarf who volunteered to be golemized and became "Shale."
Shayle (Dwarf) = Shale (Golem)
Comment by Adarel on August 3, 2010 at 10:02 pm
Her name as a dwarf was “Shayle”. I changed usage within the post to reflect the difference in identity.
Comment by Delilah on August 19, 2010 at 2:34 pm
"The fact that that thing tries to drag me to it's level"
D=!!!!!!
As a trans woman this really disturbs me on a profound level.